首页> 外文OA文献 >Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: Comparative study of Beijing and Sydney
【2h】

Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: Comparative study of Beijing and Sydney

机译:在公共项目中采用关系契约实践的驱动因素和障碍:北京和悉尼的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When contracting parties adopt relational contracting (RC) as opposed to formal contracting stance, the construction project may achieve good outcomes. However, public projects usually face more constraints in adopting RC, as close relationships may lead to allegations of corruption. The aim of this study is to undertake a comparative analysis of drivers and barriers to adopting RC practices in public construction projects in two different markets viz. a centrally planned economy and a free market economy by investigating practices in Beijing and Sydney. The survey research design was adopted and data of public construction projects in Beijing and Sydney were collected using a structured questionnaire. The results revealed that relationship quality and level of harmony among contracting parties are significantly good in both cities. In Sydney, the level of inter-personal relations between contractors and consultants is significantly higher than in Beijing. It was found that the same 18 factors drive contracting parties in Beijing and Sydney to adopt RC practices, and in 6 instances, these are significantly greater drivers in Sydney. The barriers to adopting RC practices are totally dissimilar in both cities. Contracting parties in Beijing could not adopt more RC practices because of a lack of training in relational arrangement and public clients lack initiative in adopting RC practices. The conservative industry culture that encourages preservation of the status quo is also prevalent in Beijing. In Sydney, the only significant barrier is public sector accountability concerns. To cultivate readiness to embrace RC practices, it is suggested that industry professionals and the government adopt recommendations highlighted in this study according to the type of market structure.
机译:当签约方采用关系签约而不是正式签约时,建设项目可能会取得良好的成果。但是,公共项目在采用RC时通常会遇到更多限制,因为亲密关系可能导致对腐败的指控。本研究的目的是对两个不同市场的公共建设项目中采用RC做法的动因和障碍进行比较分析。通过调查北京和悉尼的做法,实现中央计划经济和自由市场经济。采用调查研究设计,并使用结构化问卷收集了北京和悉尼的公共建设项目数据。结果表明,缔约双方之间的关系质量和和睦程度在两个城市中都非常好。在悉尼,承包商与顾问之间的人际关系水平明显高于北京。研究发现,同样的18个因素驱使北京和悉尼的签约方采用RC惯例,在6种情况下,这些因素在悉尼的推动力明显更大。在两个城市,采用RC做法的障碍完全不同。由于缺乏关系安排方面的培训,并且公共客户缺乏采用RC惯例的主动性,北京的缔约方无法采用更多的RC惯例。鼓励保持现状的保守的行业文化在北京也很普遍。在悉尼,唯一的重大障碍是对公共部门问责制的担忧。为了培养接受RC做法的意愿,建议行业专业人员和政府根据市场结构的类型采纳本研究中强调的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号